It's interesting that consumers would rather spend less money on a disposable TV with a bad picture than pay a little more for something they will enjoy so much more in the long run.
No it's not. Most consumers think stretch-o-vision is HD. They buy Vizio because 1) it costs less and 2) no one cares when you're watching football if the panny plasma would look better.
“Measuring 21.5 inches each, with 1920 x 1080 resolution, 1,000:1 contrast ratio, and optical multitouch technology under their chunky bezels, these two models represent the biggest mainstream push for touchscreen computing yet.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It's interesting that consumers would rather spend less money on a disposable TV with a bad picture than pay a little more for something they will enjoy so much more in the long run.
No it's not. Most consumers think stretch-o-vision is HD. They buy Vizio because 1) it costs less and 2) no one cares when you're watching football if the panny plasma would look better.
i agree a sammy for me i like the styles of their tvs and much more better quality than vizio