"I'm sure if this was a $200 Blu Ray player you wouldn't exactly be "underwhelmed""
If there was a $200 Blu-ray player, then it would be a new low and it would be 1080p. Why would he be underwhelmed? It would be great news. Why would anyone buy this two bit Chinese player over Toshiba's $199 player, considering it also comes with 5 free movies?
Why would a $200 bluray player for sure be playing 1080p? i'm sure if they wanted to make a budget player they'd use cheaper hardware that can only supply the 1080i bandwidth... which in the end doesn't matter for 24p source material.
“It's rare if a month flies by without some random university or DIYer proclaiming that the next major jump in battery technology is just over the horizon.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"I'm sure if this was a $200 Blu Ray player you wouldn't exactly be "underwhelmed""
If there was a $200 Blu-ray player, then it would be a new low and it would be 1080p. Why would he be underwhelmed? It would be great news. Why would anyone buy this two bit Chinese player over Toshiba's $199 player, considering it also comes with 5 free movies?
Why would a $200 bluray player for sure be playing 1080p? i'm sure if they wanted to make a budget player they'd use cheaper hardware that can only supply the 1080i bandwidth... which in the end doesn't matter for 24p source material.