<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hear the only issue is that when you aren't playing a tallscreen movie you'll get very very thick black bars on the top and bottom]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[locke6854]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2007 5:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Engadget shows the LCD6520P-AV version in this picture.  If you go to their website you can view the LCD6520L-AV, which is the standard widescreen version.  Here is a link for that one: <a href="http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/DigitalMediaLibrary/Downloads/?product=1232f009-73dd-4844-9eb3-8537750a321b" rel="nofollow">http://www.necdisplay.com/Products/DigitalMediaLibrary/Downloads/?product=1232f009-73dd-4844-9eb3-8537750a321b</a>  The only problem I see is that it is only 2,000:1 contrast ratio.  I mean really, with a 65" screen, your going to notice the crappy blacks.  My 46" Samsung 1080p LCD has 10,000:1.  These guys really need to step it up before I write this off as a "business expense".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2007 1:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Your Samsung has a 10000:1 DYNAMIC contrast ratio, which is purely meaningless.  That NEC display has a 2000:1 STATIC contrast ratio.  It most likely looks better than your Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2007 6:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wish more companies would make large screen lcds instead of lcdtvs to drive costs down.  I mean I paid $3000 for my smasung lnt4671 and its filled with useless components I dont want or need (standard def hook-ups, 2 component, 3 hdmis (I only need 1), optical out, qam tuner, atsc tuner etc etc.  I feel I could of saved big if they made the same quality display without all those "TV" components as I only need my display for using my htpc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2007 10:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[LCD displays suck and the picture quality is the worst, even worse than CRT.  Crushed blacks (nearly no shadow detail) and muddy dark grey for blacks...horrible for viewing in the dark.<br><br>Plasma displays are far superior - particularily Pioneer's Kuro line of plasmas which have a true 15,000:1 STATIC contrast ratio.  Blows away any and all flat panels on the market including these crappy overpriced NEC LCDs and those from Samsung and Sony.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HDpurist]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 1:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[Contrast ratio actually needs to be specified using ANSI or other standardized testing method, otherwise it's just meaningless.  I think even ANSI might be fudgeable.<br><br>"Dynamic" contrast is one where the backlight is dimmed for dark scenes, and that really screws things up, so your black level is all over the place depending on the white level required in a given frame, and the backlight is probably always lagging anyway when it does that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JeffDM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 10th 2007 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC reveals commercial grade 65-inch LCD6520 LCD]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2007/12/09/nec-reveals-commercial-grade-65-inch-lcd6520-lcd/</guid><description><![CDATA[HDpurist,<br><br>Actually the Kuro HDTVs have been measured at slightly above a 3000:1 ANSI static contrast, which is still the highest ever tested.  Sony's XBR4 LCD actually measure pretty high--somewhere right around above 2000:1.  I think the Samsung 81 series is in second place though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2007 7:58PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>