SED has no image quality advantages over oled devices. The main advantage of sed was the ability to leverage existing CRT plants in production. Meaning large cheap displays.
Sed are not flat. They are like micro crts with one electron gun per pixel. They use phosphers step up transformers and glass. They are much thicker than both LCD and PDP and much heavier.
The price of a 42" lcd panel is $700 at my local best buy.
Sed would have to release this year to have a chance to compete. It is for all effect a dead technology that will under deliver compared to LCD's of the time.
Sorry, you must login or register to leave a comment!
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
The window on SED technology is closing.
SED has no image quality advantages over oled devices. The main advantage of sed was the ability to leverage existing CRT plants in production. Meaning large cheap displays.
Sed are not flat. They are like micro crts with one electron gun per pixel. They use phosphers step up transformers and glass. They are much thicker than both LCD and PDP and much heavier.
The price of a 42" lcd panel is $700 at my local best buy.
Sed would have to release this year to have a chance to compete. It is for all effect a dead technology that will under deliver compared to LCD's of the time.
another ignoramus with comments like these, if
you actually understood how these panels work
you would not open your mouth