weaker? hahah you make me laugh. 1) Blu-ray holds >60% more data per layer/disc. 25GB v 15GB, 50GB vs 30GB 2) Blu-ray has a >60% higher total audio+video bitrate. 48Mbits/s vs 30Mbits/s, which means higher video quality due to higher bitrate encodes. 3) Blu's subsystems and components are higher quality made of custom ASICs vs the budget intel celeron chips running the HDDVD.
Seriously why do people like you keep spreading FUD. blu-ray is *technically* SUPERIOR! You can root for whoever you want, but don't spread lies...
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
More good news for Blu. :)
Blu-ray is is pathetic...I guess just like Beta vs. VHS, like the PS2 vs. the Xbox, the weaker format wins again.
@KRIS
weaker? hahah you make me laugh.
1) Blu-ray holds >60% more data per layer/disc. 25GB v 15GB, 50GB vs 30GB
2) Blu-ray has a >60% higher total audio+video bitrate. 48Mbits/s vs 30Mbits/s, which means higher video quality due to higher bitrate encodes.
3) Blu's subsystems and components are higher quality made of custom ASICs vs the budget intel celeron chips running the HDDVD.
Seriously why do people like you keep spreading FUD. blu-ray is *technically* SUPERIOR!
You can root for whoever you want, but don't spread lies...