weaker? hahah you make me laugh. 1) Blu-ray holds >60% more data per layer/disc. 25GB v 15GB, 50GB vs 30GB 2) Blu-ray has a >60% higher total audio+video bitrate. 48Mbits/s vs 30Mbits/s, which means higher video quality due to higher bitrate encodes. 3) Blu's subsystems and components are higher quality made of custom ASICs vs the budget intel celeron chips running the HDDVD.
Seriously why do people like you keep spreading FUD. blu-ray is *technically* SUPERIOR! You can root for whoever you want, but don't spread lies...
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
@KRIS
weaker? hahah you make me laugh.
1) Blu-ray holds >60% more data per layer/disc. 25GB v 15GB, 50GB vs 30GB
2) Blu-ray has a >60% higher total audio+video bitrate. 48Mbits/s vs 30Mbits/s, which means higher video quality due to higher bitrate encodes.
3) Blu's subsystems and components are higher quality made of custom ASICs vs the budget intel celeron chips running the HDDVD.
Seriously why do people like you keep spreading FUD. blu-ray is *technically* SUPERIOR!
You can root for whoever you want, but don't spread lies...