Lord of the Rings on Blu-Ray is going to be sweet. I have the first LOTR on VHS so I think I'll get it on Blu.
Thats not a nice move by Sony. But Sony is known for being an expensive brand. The only reason they went against their motto with a cheap player is because the situation called for it. I know its the way Sony does business but its still not very nice to the consumer.
Peter Jackson said he felt the theatrical versions of LOTR were the definitive versions, since they preserve the pacing. I, for one, was never sensitive to "movie pacing", and I thought the extended cuts had some of the best scenes. I really hope they decide to release extended cuts.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Lord of the Rings on Blu-Ray is going to be sweet. I have the first LOTR on VHS so I think I'll get it on Blu.
Thats not a nice move by Sony. But Sony is known for being an expensive brand. The only reason they went against their motto with a cheap player is because the situation called for it. I know its the way Sony does business but its still not very nice to the consumer.
Peter Jackson said he felt the theatrical versions of LOTR were the definitive versions, since they preserve the pacing. I, for one, was never sensitive to "movie pacing", and I thought the extended cuts had some of the best scenes. I really hope they decide to release extended cuts.