<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[Deets?  I thought we had banned that awful word!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2008 8:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can anyone tell me why I would want this, when the Epson 1080 UB has better contrast ratio (50,000:1 vs. 10,000:1), better ANSI lumens (1600 vs. 1000), and costs less than half as much?<br><br><a href="http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/08/epson-launches-1080p-powerlite-home-cinema-1080-ub-projector/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadgethd.com/2008/01/08/epson-launches-1080p-powerlite-home-cinema-1080-ub-projector/</a><br><br>Is it because it is 8db quieter, has an extra HDMI port, or because it "delivers soft blue lighting and has a 'dolphin-like' design".?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[numlok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2008 12:09AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[One buys this rather than other projectors because JOE KANE helped design it - especially its color related abilities.  Do a google search to learn more about Joe Kane....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[VinylVision]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 9th 2008 12:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SP-A800B DLP projector gets some deets]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/01/08/samsungs-sp-a800b-dlp-projector-gets-some-deets/</guid><description><![CDATA[I respect Joe Kane (I own DVE, and am waiting ANXIOUSLY for the Blu-Ray update).<br><br>That said...<br><br>I simply have a hard time looking at the specs (namely the Epson's 5x the contrast-ratio combined with 12-bit/x.v. color) and believing that the Samsung can be better, let alone better enough to warrant nearly twice the expense... regardless of who helped design it.<br><br>It just seems like either Epson would have to have made SERIOUS errors in hardware implementation, or Joe Kane would have to have added some SERIOUS "magic" to the lesser-spec'd Samsung in order to reverse what would appear to be Epson's clear advantage.  The latter may be entirely possible, but based off of all the early reviews I've read, I doubt the former is.<br><br>I suppose the only real way to find out for sure is to get optimized (using DVE Blu-Ray, of course) versions of these units side-by-side for comparison.  ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[numlok]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2008 3:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>