You may have a point. I made my decision early on to go for Blu-Ray based on the tech-spec, knowing full well the marked could go either way.
I can not for the life of me figure out how blu-ray outsold HD DVD given the crap titles they selected to penetrate the marked. I can only say that with e in charge, the blu-ray catalog would look very much different from what it is today. But i guess the powers that be knew what they where doing -- doesn't the old saying state that no-body ever got rich over-estimating their customers?
Sales in Europe are very much slanted towards Blu-Ray, in to 70 - 85% range. On the home-market, BBC has an easy pick when it comes time to pick a side. And i don't think they will pick any differently in the US.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
You may have a point. I made my decision early on to go for Blu-Ray based on the tech-spec, knowing full well the marked could go either way.
I can not for the life of me figure out how blu-ray outsold HD DVD given the crap titles they selected to penetrate the marked. I can only say that with e in charge, the blu-ray catalog would look very much different from what it is today. But i guess the powers that be knew what they where doing -- doesn't the old saying state that no-body ever got rich over-estimating their customers?
Sales in Europe are very much slanted towards Blu-Ray, in to 70 - 85% range. On the home-market, BBC has an easy pick when it comes time to pick a side. And i don't think they will pick any differently in the US.