http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/ Engadget Comments for Display technology shootout: OLED vs. LCD vs. plasma http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
And with Sony and Samsung (my two favourite manufacturers) leading the OLED charge, theres lots to be excited for.]]>Jan 27th 2008 5:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
If OLEDs become affordable enough and the yields increase it should be able to become the new CRT.]]>Jan 27th 2008 5:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/

Prototype 20.8" OLED with 50000 hrs has been made in research phase so life span of oled dsplays one day will be moot.

Eco friendly, better pictures, less cost to manufacture over competitors, lightweight, superthin, cost savings on mass shipping worldwide, etc etc. Lots of advantages. OLED is the future of displays.
]]>Jan 31st 2008 4:07AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
Its way above the others in picture but what will really sell it is the power it uses, very little. And we all know how important that is becoming.]]>Jan 27th 2008 6:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
Deep blacks, razor thin screens, instant response times. Its no wonder the big guns are investing in this technology.]]>Jan 27th 2008 7:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
OLED is the best of the 3, by far. Go check out the XEL-1 in person if you can, it's nothing short of amazing. Small, yes, but no less impressive. In the next year or two we'll start to see desktop monitor sizes and above. And in some years after that, we'll be laughing at what LCDs where like, with their comedic "dynamic" contrast ratios of 3000:1 and speeds measured in milliseconds while OLEDs sport 1,000,000:1 contrast ratios, black levels comparable to CRTs and speeds so fast, they're measured in microseconds.

Yeah, I want one, badly :)
]]>Jan 27th 2008 7:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
Also: it seems stupid to leave out laser TV. Not everybody cares about screen depth. If (yes, *if*) picture quality of a laser TV is superior to OLED, and the TV costs half as much, you can be damn sure I'll buy it even if it's 10" thick instead of 1" thick. Picture quality should come first (although if we were talking about a 600 pound 4-foot deep CRT, there'd be an issue for me).]]>Jan 27th 2008 8:40PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824005085) eats 45 Watts just like Sony's 11" OLED TV. It's got nearly 4x the screen area (I said 2x before), but it does lack TV tuner hardware. Upgrading to a 20" LCD TV on NewEgg, I'm seeing around 60 Watts. But, again, that's almost 4x the screen real-estate for 30% more power on the LCD compared to the OLED. Even just assuming the TV hardware eats the 15 Watt difference, that puts an OLED 11" monitor at 30 Watts compared to 45 Watts for a 20" LCD monitor. Again, not power efficient by comparison.

I'm still waiting to truly see a low-power OLED...]]>Jan 27th 2008 8:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
Thanks for telling me about that story Godskitchen and hemmy, its certainly not "long ago" even PHOLED was only 20,000 on blue..but I'm not going to make a big deal out of that.]]>Jan 27th 2008 8:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
No need to wait the next 10 years for OLED to play catchup with affordable 60" panels. We've watched LCD play catchup to Plasma and LCD is still junk to this day. OLED will be no doubt the best but it will take years before we see anything remotely affordable. ]]>Jan 28th 2008 12:13AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/Jan 28th 2008 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/Jan 28th 2008 5:22AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/27/display-technology-shootout--oled-vs-lcd-vs-plasma/
http://laser-tv.org]]>Feb 24th 2008 2:34AM