Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
Warner is not going to waste the effort of putting features into HD DVD. It's a dead format, simply not worth the money.
Ironic you say this, since most HD DVD releases by Warner to this point have included more special features than the Blu-ray version, due to the crippling inadequacies of 1.0 and even 1.1 spec Blu-ray players compared to every HD DVD player.
TrentD, he said "not going", which imply the future. Your argument would have been valid when Warner was neutral and both formats were battling neck and neck, now that Warner is clearly on Blu's side, your argument is as weightless as Aerogel.
Chilicoke,
My point was that they certainly saw a reason to "waste the effort" before, due to HD DVDs inherent superiorities over Blu-ray.