http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/ Engadget Comments for Lumenlab's Q42 finally loose for under $4000 http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 2:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 2:30PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/
http://computers.pricegrabber.com/keyboards/m/7412402/

Wireless keyboard and trackpad combo (2.4 gHz RF)

Works with PCs and Macs. I have mine connected to my mac mini that displays on my Aquos. Works great.]]>Feb 4th 2008 9:02PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 2:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 4:11PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/
Oh and MBA's CPU is probably a good 10x faster then yours - not to mention that is has 20x the RAM and a much better GPU - even if it is integrated.

I'm not trying to defend the MBA - I'm a Mac user and I of all people find the Air to be pretty useless.... but your ignorance is just plain annoying.]]>Feb 4th 2008 8:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 2:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/
You are better off buying a normal TV and plugging a PC into it.

Now if it was touch screen, under 20 inches, ran more as a network PC than a full-blown system, and cost under $1K, I'd be interested in one for my kitchen.

]]>Feb 4th 2008 3:10PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 4:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 3:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 3:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/
Also your Celeron 500 is not driving the graphics, it's your graphics card.

I am running an old ATI Radeon Mobility 9000 with a whopping 32MB memory that is driving a native 1400x1050 and external 1680x1050 for programming and documents just fine. It also works just fine for DVDs on a single screen. I am sure the Intel GMA X3100 in the Macbook Air can do an adequate job with a single 1920x1080 panel.

That is unless you are playing games, in which case you are better off getting a proper gaming rig or console.]]>Feb 4th 2008 4:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 4:57PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/
Plus if it were and Apple product, it would cost more, have fewer features and you could only get it in one color.]]>Feb 4th 2008 5:13PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 5:19PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/They sell Mac minis beautifully hidden in NEC-Displays. Though their website is pretty unfinished at the moment, I´ve already seen finished 46"ers and they´re just plain beautiful.

]]>Feb 4th 2008 5:23PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 5:28PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/04/lumenlabs-q42-finally-loose-for-under-4000/Feb 4th 2008 7:23PM