Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"With all the new multitouch capable monitors coming out, which one is the best? With the release of Windows 7 I really want a touchscreen monitor for my desktop. I'm looking to get a Full HD monitor that supports multitouch and can still look great during gaming and movies. Which one has the best specs for the price?"
So, 'in the not so distant future', when HD is ubiquitous, what would be the point of having both an ESPNews HD and ESPNews SD? Plus the channel names will seem increasingly silly, akin to stating 'TV Channel X - now with moving pictures!' Seriously, I haven't really read about what happens to redundant non-broadcast SD feeds in the long run - anyone?
"Not so distant future" being a relative term ;)
There is a difference between HD and digital. Just because a broadcast is sent digitally doesn't mean its HD. That is the reasoning between ESPNEWS HD and ESPNEWS (SD).