http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/ Engadget HD Comments for PBS baby-steps towards HD http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 2:54PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/
Oh, and don't cut PBS *any* slack for being "not for profit". Keep in mind that they're partially funded by the U.S. taxpayer via numerous federal grants. I've worked with people who worked at my local PBS station (yeah, I know, the friend of a friend stuff...), but the consensus was that PBS can get any piece of TV and radio hardware that you could possibly think of. The quarterly (or semi-annually) begging for money apparently is not very necessary, at least at the local affiliate.

Now, the issue of satellite bandwidth ... are there not other satellites on which they could lease bandwidth? No sarcasm. Serious question.]]>Feb 11th 2008 3:16PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 3:23PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 3:24PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 3:33PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 3:55PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 6:00PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 12th 2008 8:33AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 6:11PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 11th 2008 7:13PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/central... hence the typical "tomorrow at 8/7 central".]]>Feb 11th 2008 7:50PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/Feb 12th 2008 1:09AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/11/pbs-baby-steps-towards-hd/
What happened to Wired Science? Was that canned? I thought that was pretty neat, but poorly promoted. I have a friend that subscribes to the Wired magazine and he's never heard of Wired Science.]]>Feb 12th 2008 1:22AM