Um, mlody11, one major flaw with your Warner argument. Warner started exclusive to HD DVD, then went neutral, and still HD DVD was getting clobbered by Blu-ray. If they had gone to HD DVD, at best there would have been a prolonged stalemate in the format war. That's exactly what they said they wanted to avoid.
I'm only saying wait for 2.0 (if you don't want a PS3) because it seems that most forum members want to ensure their player meets all the specs. I personally think BD-Live is going to be mostly a waste of time, like the current examples of Internet-enabled titles on HD DVD that let you buy crappy licensed merchandise using your HD DVD player. Oooooh, what a wonderful use of the technology! Not.
The Rip is the latest addition to the Boogie eWriter line, devices that let you scribble notes and drawings and can be wiped away with the press of a button.
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Um, mlody11, one major flaw with your Warner argument. Warner started exclusive to HD DVD, then went neutral, and still HD DVD was getting clobbered by Blu-ray. If they had gone to HD DVD, at best there would have been a prolonged stalemate in the format war. That's exactly what they said they wanted to avoid.
I'm only saying wait for 2.0 (if you don't want a PS3) because it seems that most forum members want to ensure their player meets all the specs. I personally think BD-Live is going to be mostly a waste of time, like the current examples of Internet-enabled titles on HD DVD that let you buy crappy licensed merchandise using your HD DVD player. Oooooh, what a wonderful use of the technology! Not.