<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Someone sitting 1.5 times the width of the display and with 20-20 vision can resolve 1100 line-pairs, one would need to either have considerable much better vision than 20-20 or be considerably much closer to the screen to resolve greater than 1100 line-pairs.<br><br>Not sitting closer than 1.5 times the screen's width nor having better than 20-20 vision means you will never 'see' the added resolution. Go get'em Tiger!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 5:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[So if you get this tv the only thing that is going to look really good on it is IMAX ,right? I mean wouldn't this make even standard HD look kinda like standard TV does on an HDTV? I'm all for the best ,but you have to be realistic ,where are you going to get the content for this TV from?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 8:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Halliburton (as in Dick Cheney) did it!!!<br><br><a href="http://www.halliburton.com/ps/default.aspx?pageid=1749&navid=673&prodid=PRN::JO84B3LPT" rel="nofollow">http://www.halliburton.com/ps/default.aspx?pageid=1749&navid=673&prodid=PRN::JO84B3LPT</a><br><br>*Cue evil Republican HDTV conspiracy theory*]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2008 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Astro Systems introduces 56-inch 4K x 2K LCD monitor]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/02/13/astro-systems-introduces-56-inch-4k-x-2k-lcd-monitor/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whatever happened to "Good Things in Small Packages"? I am currently looking for a replacement for my old (1985ish) 26" television set and I am extremely dismayed that I must go large to have good quality in a Flat screen. I don't want to fill up a living-space wall to be entertained and my news anchors don't need to "larger than life", their egos are big enough thank you. While I admit that being able to veiw natural vistas in its wide expanse like I was there could be interesting, I just don't have the room inside my house. More to the point, I cannot afford to  purchase another domicile, and my current property is too small add a media room to my current home.<br>Can these wonderful, high quality panaramic details be put in a smaller device, or is that just not technologically feasible? Am I asking too much? Or am I,and others like me, not financially significant.<br>I await a response, but I'm not holding my breath. Nor am I expecting a satisfactory solution to my dilemma.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[David Whitmore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 13th 2008 8:29AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>