Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
That's gotta burn all of the HD DVD chaps good, awesome!
Hmm? Isn't everyone glad this is over? What burns is that they start at $399. HD-DVD started at $149. It's a shame that the price is so high. The war with HD-DVD over, but lets see consumers adopt the format at these prices.
Yes, that's it. Show the world why so many HD DVD supporters dislike the arrogance of many BD fanboys! I suppose that dancing around an HD DVD player taking turns whacking it with a sledgehammer chanting "Blu-ray! Blu-Ray!" is on your agenda for tonight?
How pathetic that so many people like you, TT, nFinity, H4ldol, etc. have taken so seriously the encoding method of a f**king 12cm piece of plastic. Get over it.
What's worse is that they have no idea what they're talking about when they spew out random jabs like "higher bit rates on Blu-ray." They automatically assume more is better/superior. A skilled compressionist can do an excellent job with the medium average bit rates offered on HD DVD. As codecs improve (likely 50% over the course of its use), bit rates will become wholly irrelevant as they did on DVD. The MPEG-2 encoders now are so efficient that it's remarkable how good DVD picture quality can get on modern releases.