<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for NEC intros network-ready VT800 projector</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for NEC intros network-ready VT800 projector</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros network-ready VT800 projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Best I can tell, this is a 4:3 1024x768 projector. That means, if you're watching widescreen content, the letterboxing takes you down to 576 pixels on the vertical axis.<br><br>Thats 576p. Well below 720p. Not HD.  Why put such a projector on EngadgetHD? <br><br>It is a nice product...but it's not a good choice for an HD home theater, because it's not HD. Anybody investing in 1080p blu-ray or HD cable/satellite/OTA services would be silly to downconvert it all to 576p.<br><br>You're posting debates about "should I replace my 720p TV with 1080p" -- who on Engadget HD would want to settle for 576p? <br><br>We hear enough debate about the screen size/viewing distance at which 720p and 1080p are distinguishable...but the whole point of a projector is to make a big screen. In a home theater, a projected 80" 576p image is not going to look too nice, methinks. Why not stick to actual HD-capable projectors here on EngadgetHD?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[EQC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 6th 2008 8:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros network-ready VT800 projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[EQC wrote exactly what I thought the moment I saw 1024x768 as the resolution. While it may be a nice product, it isn't appropriate for EngadgetHD. Let's keep the focus here on HD related products...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2008 2:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC intros network-ready VT800 projector]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/03/06/nec-intros-network-ready-vt800-projector/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yep, based on the lumens and contrast ratio, this is obviously a business projector for giving presentations, not to use in a home theater.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 7th 2008 8:26AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>