But "suck badly". The picture on a Sharp LCD was near-unparalleled in home devices 10 years ago. How can it be considered to "suck badly"? You can go look at a whole lineups of TVs at your local Best Buy or whatever and the Sharp would rank in the top 10%. You can't really say that the 90th percentile is "sucking badly", can you?
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This is terrible news, as good as Panasonic are, I don't think they are as close to perfect as Pioneer.
And Sharp LCDs tend to suck, quite badly.
Sharps do have no problems, no lie.
But "suck badly". The picture on a Sharp LCD was near-unparalleled in home devices 10 years ago. How can it be considered to "suck badly"? You can go look at a whole lineups of TVs at your local Best Buy or whatever and the Sharp would rank in the top 10%. You can't really say that the 90th percentile is "sucking badly", can you?