But "suck badly". The picture on a Sharp LCD was near-unparalleled in home devices 10 years ago. How can it be considered to "suck badly"? You can go look at a whole lineups of TVs at your local Best Buy or whatever and the Sharp would rank in the top 10%. You can't really say that the 90th percentile is "sucking badly", can you?
“Getting too close completely blurred what we saw to the point of incomprehension, but again, this shows a whole heap of potential that's fascinating to us.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Sharps do have no problems, no lie.
But "suck badly". The picture on a Sharp LCD was near-unparalleled in home devices 10 years ago. How can it be considered to "suck badly"? You can go look at a whole lineups of TVs at your local Best Buy or whatever and the Sharp would rank in the top 10%. You can't really say that the 90th percentile is "sucking badly", can you?