<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[oh I'm sooooo going to sell this at the flea market!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yubastard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's enormous. Yes, when you make an antenna bigger it captures more signal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2/LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think the point is that it functions better than other high-quality antennas of the same size. Read the source articles before criticizing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[timmy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 12:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read the source articles before critizing. This isn't exactly the first article about this thing.<br><br>Yes, the double bay Gray-Hoverman outperforms a ChannelMaster 4228 significantly, by roughly 3dB. Being twice the size, it would of course pick up twice the signal. 3dB, by the way, is double the signal.<br><br>If you can get the parts cheap enough to save some money or if you really need an antenna larger than ChannelMaster can supply you, then build this thing. Otherwise, you can get a ChannelMaster 4228 or 4221 (depending on what you need) with a lot less hassle and it'll serve you well.<br><br>I use a ChannelMaster 4228 to receive HD signals from 45 miles away, despite mountains (multipath) and my refusal to put it on a tower on my roof ike I should, instead putting it in my attic.<br><br>I putting in a splitter (which attenuates 3dB plus) showed me I could even do this with a 4221. Too bad I didn't know up front, a 4221 is cheaper, easier to get into the attic, and easier to reorient in the confined space of my attic.<br><br>The single-bay Gray-Hoverman is 32"x40" and performas similarly to the 36"x40" ChannelMaster 4228. But they don't do this comparison in the article. They compare the 20"x40" CM4221 to the 32"x40" single-bay Gray-Hoverman. And they compare the 36"x40" CM4228 (which is basically a double-bay 4221) to the 75"x40" Gray-Hoverman. The Gray-Hoverman picks up twice the signal in both cases, by virtue of being twice the size.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2/LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 1:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[And please remember that if you will use this antenna outdoors, consider wind-load.  The bigger the antenna, the more wind-load.  plus home made antennas are usually less sturdy than commercial ones.  (Atleast mine are)  But if you have the room to shove this in an attic then, this is great.  more power to you.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ID10T Control]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[Since it has no gain in VHF spectrum, it's not useful for my region, where at least one of the HD broadcasts is, and will remain, VHF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lakeonaut]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 12:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here in the SF Bay area, people have reported success using a CM4221 or CM4228 (both UHF-only bowties setups) to pick up KNTV-11, which broadcasts in VHF channel 12.<br><br>Perhaps if your local VHF station is also on 12, you can use a UHF antenna to receive it too.<br><br>Note that I don't use a 4228 to pick up KNTV-11, I actually find that they are on VHF to be a huge advantage. I use a Yagi to pick up KNTV-11 and use a VHF/UHF splitter reversed (in combiner mode) so that the yagi picks up KNTV-11 and my 4228 picks up the UHF signals. This is advantageous because KNTV-11's transmitter is in a different location than some of the others, and this lets me aim each antenna better.<br><br>If your channel is in VHF-Hi (7-13), you can use a much smaller yagi than you think. This is helped by the better signal propagation of VHF over UHF.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2/LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 6th 2008 1:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[At least you could give me credit for the picture.  If you read my post at digitalhome.ca, I compared it to a RadioShack corner reflector (they call it a yagi) which is about 6' long.  I got consistently at least 5db and sometimes more gain with the DBGH at the same antenna location.  The antenna is not that big.  70 x 30 inches.  I made it out of 1/2" PVC and had some wire laying around, so the whole thing cost me about$30USD.  I am over 2 ridges and about 50 miles to DC and now I nearly always can get any of the UHF channels, including the digital ones where before, TV was not worth watching.<br><br>Dave (DogT)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DogT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 8th 2008 9:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[DogT,<br><br>Do you have instructions on how you built yours?  Material, parts list, etc.  Did you use the dimensions on the sketch at the link?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 30th 2008 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on DIY Gray-Hoverman antenna promises better OTA reception]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/04/06/diy-gray-hoverman-antenna-promises-better-ota-reception/</guid><description><![CDATA[RetroThing should have given more credit to the folks who have worked to bring back an improved version of the Hoverman antenna which goes back to to fifties. They have put a lot of time and effort into bringing advanced technology to the DIY community AND putting it into the Public Domain (an area where our government has failed miserably). This design works and there are several people from different countries who have attested to it's efficacy. You can find several exact plans and directions (with pictures, including DogT's version) on their forum: <a href="http://www.digitalhome.ca/ota/superantenna/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalhome.ca/ota/superantenna/</a><br>Charles (rydnek)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rydnek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2008 11:52AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>