Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
Let me get this straight - the BBC in its infinite wisdom uses a bunch of proprietary and broken mechanisms to deliver content, but it's the 360 and PS3's fault that those broken mechanisms don't work? Right...
As it happens, the PS3 can quite happily play back the MP4 content that the BBC exposes for the iPod. You have to rip it by hand to circumvent the server side user agent checks, and move it from a Quicktime to MP4 container but once you do that the content plays just fine.
It should be straightforward to enable the PS3 to access content through its browser - add the PS3 user agent string to the list of permitted browsers and deliver content in a .MP4 container. Now that wasn't hard to do was it?
This is more or less how they support the iPod now except they use a .mov container. I bet the iPod supports MP4 containers too so there is no reason even to have .mov for iPod and .mp4 for the PS3. Just move everything to .mp4 and they can serve all devices.
Maybe the BBC should question why they are making it so hard for people to download shows. Do they really think there is a massive market for the latest edition of Eastenders or Songs of Praise? They should just do a deal with Vuze / Azureus to deliver their content through bittorrent and be done with it.