In general, Europe has been slow to adopt HD. It's one area where the US is currently far ahead, if the 40+ HD channels I currently have are any indication.
that's because we've had widescreen since 1998 and our PAL broadcasts are 567 if we'd only had 4:3 and 480 like you guys then we'd see a bigger difference in the step up. Plus your stations make a LOT more money that ours from advertising, ours make a loss with an HD channel
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
In general, Europe has been slow to adopt HD. It's one area where the US is currently far ahead, if the 40+ HD channels I currently have are any indication.
that's because we've had widescreen since 1998 and our PAL broadcasts are 567
if we'd only had 4:3 and 480 like you guys then we'd see a bigger difference in the step up. Plus your stations make a LOT more money that ours from advertising, ours make a loss with an HD channel