or Mr. E Sony is able to lose more money as they are getting a large chunk of Blu-Ray licensing so they can STILL afford to lose more money. Onkyo is not getting ANYTHING from licensing actually has to pay BDA fees to release a player.
That's why you see these humongous prices. It's common sense for christ sake and pretty well known thing. There was an analysis of licensing to develop Blu-Ray players. Why do you think they are coming out with PRofile 1.1 and not profile 2.0 player? Because they cant?! LOL .. it's because they have to pay through the nose.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.â€
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
or Mr. E Sony is able to lose more money as they are getting a large chunk of Blu-Ray licensing so they can STILL afford to lose more money. Onkyo is not getting ANYTHING from licensing actually has to pay BDA fees to release a player.
That's why you see these humongous prices. It's common sense for christ sake and pretty well known thing. There was an analysis of licensing to develop Blu-Ray players. Why do you think they are coming out with PRofile 1.1 and not profile 2.0 player? Because they cant?! LOL .. it's because they have to pay through the nose.
As I said.. GREED.