Android accounts for one-quarter of mobile web traffic
Android is mopping up Apple and RIM's declining mobile mindshare in the US, you'll find nothing but corroboration from Quantcast. The analytics firm reckons a full one-quarter of mobile web traffic stateside comes from devices running Google's OS
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
It still is a crap player. Thanks, but no thanks.
At least is not as crappier as your post...
Care to explain how you know it's a "crap" player? Go ahead and post a link to the review you read or, better yet, share your experiences if you personally own one.
1. look at the specs (or lack of, shall I say, particularly in the audio area)
2. look at the brand
3. look at yourself in the mirror and ask, "would I really buy this blu-ray player?"
And in the mirror, (if it's clean) you should start to a nice, shiny PS3 appear, for only $50 more, and more than making up for no $100 of movies.
I'm not sure what you're getting it. It has HDMI to pass on everything to your receiver and let it do all the audio decoding, or you can use the optical to do that as well.
The player looks like it does everything except 2.0 profile, which is doesn't mean much at this point.
How do we even know it bitstreams DTS-MA/TrueHD? The PS3 doesn't even, and can't unless it's given a hardware revisoin, bitstream DTS-MA.
For Audio, this thing sucks. And I wouldn't count on its video performances either. There are much better players for your money.
@dj496
I don't want a PS3. I understand that it's quite highly rated as a Blu-ray player, however, I don't need another game system and, personally, I think it's ugly. Also, it's not compatible with my Harmony remote without an adapter (adding more money). So, adding up the difference you get $50 difference in price, $100 in free movies and $55 for the remote adapter. That's a $205 difference. Quite a bit if you ask me. Now, regarding the specs...if it plays movies then it does it's job. People always moan about how players don't do this, or that they do such and such poorly. When it comes right down to it if it plays movies then it works. I'm not saying that I'm running out to buy this player but at the price point it's at I think it's a viable choice for many, many people. I can't believe that at $350 it's at the bottom of the spectrum though. Wow.