@dj496 I don't want a PS3. I understand that it's quite highly rated as a Blu-ray player, however, I don't need another game system and, personally, I think it's ugly. Also, it's not compatible with my Harmony remote without an adapter (adding more money). So, adding up the difference you get $50 difference in price, $100 in free movies and $55 for the remote adapter. That's a $205 difference. Quite a bit if you ask me. Now, regarding the specs...if it plays movies then it does it's job. People always moan about how players don't do this, or that they do such and such poorly. When it comes right down to it if it plays movies then it works. I'm not saying that I'm running out to buy this player but at the price point it's at I think it's a viable choice for many, many people. I can't believe that at $350 it's at the bottom of the spectrum though. Wow.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
@dj496
I don't want a PS3. I understand that it's quite highly rated as a Blu-ray player, however, I don't need another game system and, personally, I think it's ugly. Also, it's not compatible with my Harmony remote without an adapter (adding more money). So, adding up the difference you get $50 difference in price, $100 in free movies and $55 for the remote adapter. That's a $205 difference. Quite a bit if you ask me. Now, regarding the specs...if it plays movies then it does it's job. People always moan about how players don't do this, or that they do such and such poorly. When it comes right down to it if it plays movies then it works. I'm not saying that I'm running out to buy this player but at the price point it's at I think it's a viable choice for many, many people. I can't believe that at $350 it's at the bottom of the spectrum though. Wow.