<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really don't understand why display manufacturers are putting the cart before the horse with 3D. There is no industry standard for delivering 3D to the home, so without that there's no reason to buy any of these displays (at least for 3D). We don't even know which if any of them will be compatible with an eventual home 3D standard. Talk about a waste of money.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. E]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[Displays are where it starts. If there is no way to view 3d content there will be no desire to produce 3d content much less players.<br><br>Although on players I believe that BD players are capable of delivering 3d content via hdmi.<br><br>Will all of the major animation studios launching 3d movies content will be there soon. <br><br>Right now if you want 3d you need to use your pc. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[also talk about lame. 2,000:1 contrast? come on. they can do better then that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MidnightDT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[A genuine 2000:1 contrast ratio is pretty decent for an LCD TV display, even if it isn't that great a contrast ratio in itself per se.<br><br>That is providing that is a real measured actual contrast ratio and not that worthless advertsing BS the 'dynamic contrast ratio', of course.<br><br>If they had used 'dynamic ratio then they could probably have lied about having a 10,000:1 - 30,000:1 or some such other nonsense as many LCD companies currently do <br>(which if you check with a reputable reviewing organisation who do the real measurement turns out to be a true 800:1 - 1400:1).]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Truth Teller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 2:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[Joe, How do you get 3D on your PC? I'd like to check this out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lakersin2025]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 1:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[8ms response with shutter-glasses is going to look really bad; tons of ghosting.  This only really works well with CRTs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Raptor007]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 3:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Philips introducing 52-inch 1080p 3D display]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/05/philips-introducing-52-inch-1080p-3d-display/</guid><description><![CDATA[calm yourselves people.  3d is still years away from mainstream implementation.  Just look at HD.  Hd is like 10 years old almost in commercial sets and only now its finally hitting just the 30%+ of tv owners have an hd set.  Dont expect 3d to take off overnight.  Expect another 10 years before their fully featured.<br><br>And dont complain about lack of knowing standards and stuff now.  Do you think the first hdtvs are still going nicely today?  no their piles of crap compared to the HD sets you can buy in stores now.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2008 5:24PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>