Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
Wow, who'd a thunk it?
Another expensive Blu-ray player that completely coincidentally and for some very strange reason is a deeply underwhelming DVD player.
Seems like the obvious advantage they have (in the USA) over standard def (only 480 lines visible in the USA on SD) isn't quite enough & they have to rig the game even more, eh?
Who'd have thunk it. Crybaby finds yet another arbitrary reason to whine about blu ray. Grow up baby, your precious format is dead.
Everytime Truth Teller pollutes a Blu-ray thread, an angel loses its wings. Mods, don't let anymore angels lose their wings, IP ban this crybaby.
Oh dear, that's really pretty pathetic.
When faced with the facts clearly mentioneed in the article (a high price & underwhelming DVD performance) the resident Blu-ray cheer-leader resorts to the usual weak personal attacks.
Is there no Blu-ray story you can't 'soft-soap' no matter how bad, eh?
.......oh, & not forgetting the other one continuing that ridiculously lame & totally laughable camapaign to get me banned.
LMAO