<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</guid><description><![CDATA[this was a stupid study for a stupid cause that had an obvious outcome<br>of course looking at simulation is not the same as looking at nature<br>trust me, this would be like having a study to see if playing GTA4 would have the same effect on you as actually killing 20 people a minute and robbing stores and stealing cars<br>really WASU?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Kid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2008 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</guid><description><![CDATA[The question is whether these people in the study even appreciate HD, can these people even tell the difference between 480i and 1080i.....someone whom truly appreciates HD i suspect would have felt more of a calming effect...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shetaan819]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2008 12:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</guid><description><![CDATA[Blank Wall (Blu-ray) has been added to your Netflix Queue at position 1.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[boxmyth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 17th 2008 5:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Serene scenes on HDTV no substitute for nature]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/06/17/serene-scenes-on-hdtv-no-substitute-for-nature/</guid><description><![CDATA[Agree with SOME KID comment above about any simulation is worse than actually being there.  But as the producer of Sunrise Earth, a show which takes a little bit to put together... like finding some visual spots on the planet, going there with a couple high res HD cameras, assembling some 140 edits over the hour show... I find myself asking whether the content recorded on the HD (high or low res) cameras was really that engaging... it was, according to the UWashington study, recorded by a rooftop camera of the scene just outside the study site.  Previous studies which showed some health benefits of scenes of nature were not images of a parking lot.  Lastly, there probably were some cool things to look at in that parking lot, if you got on your knees with a macro lens and recorded the ants collecting  food.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 18th 2008 10:47AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>