No kidding -- what exactly does it change? For ESPN (or the NFL Network) to make this profitable they will have to jack up the fees. If they jack up the fees they're back to where NFLN is now, which is cable systems asking "why should we charge subscribers $1/mo. so they can watch 8 NFL games a year and a bunch of filler?" So the filler is the NBA from 1985 and boxing matches that aren't Hearns/Hagler or other entertaining stuff instead of wall-to-wall coverage of the scouting combine? What's the diff--there's a narrow audience for either.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
No kidding -- what exactly does it change? For ESPN (or the NFL Network) to make this profitable they will have to jack up the fees. If they jack up the fees they're back to where NFLN is now, which is cable systems asking "why should we charge subscribers $1/mo. so they can watch 8 NFL games a year and a bunch of filler?" So the filler is the NBA from 1985 and boxing matches that aren't Hearns/Hagler or other entertaining stuff instead of wall-to-wall coverage of the scouting combine? What's the diff--there's a narrow audience for either.