"The speed is 4 secs for single layer BD and 6 secs for BD DL50. Laughable. Today we have DVDs being replicated with "home business" replicators at the same speed."
You do realize this isn't a burner right? This creates stamped/molded disks. 6 seconds to mold, cool, metallize, wet-emboss, lacquer and UV cure a dual layer disk is fairly impressive. Their DVD9 replicators take 2.3 seconds, so while it takes just under 3 times as long, they still can output fairly well. Also realize this includes
You can believe what you want about the format. Maybe DVD will hang around for the next 10-20 years, maybe BR will eventually takes its place, who knows. But making completely irrelevant comparisons between a home duplicator (which is a multi-function burner) and a manufacturing device which works on a completely different scale just makes you look like a raving monkey.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"The speed is 4 secs for single layer BD and 6 secs for BD DL50. Laughable. Today we have DVDs being replicated with "home business" replicators at the same speed."
You do realize this isn't a burner right? This creates stamped/molded disks. 6 seconds to mold, cool, metallize, wet-emboss, lacquer and UV cure a dual layer disk is fairly impressive. Their DVD9 replicators take 2.3 seconds, so while it takes just under 3 times as long, they still can output fairly well. Also realize this includes
You can believe what you want about the format. Maybe DVD will hang around for the next 10-20 years, maybe BR will eventually takes its place, who knows. But making completely irrelevant comparisons between a home duplicator (which is a multi-function burner) and a manufacturing device which works on a completely different scale just makes you look like a raving monkey.
To see a bit of what it does: http://www.singulus.de/en/produkte/optical-disc/replikationslinien/bluline-ii-main-components.html