Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a pair of quality headphones that aren't seemingly made of glass. I'm an avid BMXer which causes me to frequently bash on any type of technology that joins me for my daily riding. I've been through the higher quality headsets in the Skullcandy line as these are supposed to be built for "abuse," which is laughable. I cant wear earbuds or canal buds, as my large ears seem to have a repelling property upon anything that sits in them. Wired or Bluetooth doesn't really matter, but I need something that can hold up to taking a few hits every now and again. I'm trying to keep 'em under $150. Thanks!"
the reviewer james plath said the transfer was excellent
http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/gangs-of-new-york/6044/2
WHAT IS THIS JAMES GUY ON CRACK the pic quality was the worst.
He's either watching it on his "reference" 42" Vizio LCD from 15 feet away, or he's afraid of biting the hand that feeds him. Either way, he has just lost all credibility as a reviewer.
Actually, it would be worth looking around at online reviewers to see just who got this right and wrong. Those who rated the GoNY picture quality highly are not reviewers I would trust in the future.
Peter Bracke on highdefdigest.com seems the most reliable reviewer for audio / video quality. He comes down hard on disks which use too much DNR or edge enhancement for example.