
With the aim of putting making Blu-ray accessible for smaller studios, Sony Creative Software has released the BAE-VX1000 encoder for disc authoring. $55,000 buys a system capable of analyzing a film automatically and offering multiple bit rate versions to be compared later, or frame by frame encoding. The finished product comes out in either h.264 or MPEG-2 form (what, no VC-1?) and it works on varying setups from one to many PCs or servers depending on what a studio can afford. Of course, it's the perfect match for Sony's
Blu-print software (now up to version 4.3) or other authoring applications, we'll wait for prices to get a bit more affordable before cranking out the next
Behind the Scenes at CES boxed set, but for the pros it might be worth it to get the same tools Sony Pictures uses.
Before he makes another of his inevitable, endless, asinine comments, can I just be the first to ask everyone *not* to feed the troll? (I think you all know who I'm talking about.)
It's too late, even without naming names you've provided a tasty meal by acknowledging his presence.
Microsoft can take the VC-1 and stuff it. I am glad Sony is not supporting it. I would rather stand behind AVC with support from multiple vendors.
Actaully VC-1 is hardly Microsoft's in the (rather ridiculous) sense you mean Siva.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/14/microsoft_vc-1_codec_analysis/
WB,New Line, and Universal use only VC-1. It is a wonderful codec just like AVC. What Sony chooses is not the industry standard, just there choice.
So what exactly does this thing do that my $400 laptop doesn't do? It can't be that difficult to encode a movie in h.264.