first- I had trouble reading your first sentence. I understand what you are saying but there seems to be a cluster f**k of words there.
Anyway... I think we should rewind some years back and instead of going 16x9 from the start of HD, gone right to 2.35:1. Why was this not done? Sure, we would have black bars taking up half the screen on SD 4:3 stuff, but heck, you could almost fit two news 4:3 news channels side by side on a display like that. 16x9 would have side black bars, but so what. Action packed 2.35:1 movies would look awesome!
There was a coalition of movie people, including as I recall Francis Ford Coppola, who appealed for a wider-than 16x9 aspect ratio standard for HDTV. I believe they were pushing for something like 2:1. Unfortunately, they came in waaaaay too late in the ATSC standards development process to be taken seriously.
I still have a dream of having a front projector with anamorphic lens, for 2.35:1 constant image height, but I really don't see the need for it in rear projection and flat panel. You'd just shift the question about "why do I have black bars above and below the screen" to "why do I have black bars at the side of the screen?" Or worse yet, the stretch mode that some people seem to like in 16x9 would become ridiculously stretched into 2.35:1.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
first- I had trouble reading your first sentence. I understand what you are saying but there seems to be a cluster f**k of words there.
Anyway... I think we should rewind some years back and instead of going 16x9 from the start of HD, gone right to 2.35:1. Why was this not done? Sure, we would have black bars taking up half the screen on SD 4:3 stuff, but heck, you could almost fit two news 4:3 news channels side by side on a display like that. 16x9 would have side black bars, but so what. Action packed 2.35:1 movies would look awesome!
There was a coalition of movie people, including as I recall Francis Ford Coppola, who appealed for a wider-than 16x9 aspect ratio standard for HDTV. I believe they were pushing for something like 2:1. Unfortunately, they came in waaaaay too late in the ATSC standards development process to be taken seriously.
I still have a dream of having a front projector with anamorphic lens, for 2.35:1 constant image height, but I really don't see the need for it in rear projection and flat panel. You'd just shift the question about "why do I have black bars above and below the screen" to "why do I have black bars at the side of the screen?" Or worse yet, the stretch mode that some people seem to like in 16x9 would become ridiculously stretched into 2.35:1.