I think that this is an amazing accomplishment, but Sony should have put it in a laptop because it is only 11". To be a T.V. that is extremely small. Sure this technology is alot more efficient, and alot more clear it should be a laptop screen not stand alone. Although it will be alot more successful when they make at least a 20" version.
yes, OLED is supposed to be much more efficient...
...but this 11" TV consumes 45 Watts. That is in the ball park of many 20" LCD monitors or TVs. I would imagine that 15-17" laptop monitors consume significantly less power than their larger, brighter, higher-res desktop counterparts too.
Put this thing in a laptop, and say goodbye to battery life...and you'll still only have an 11" screen.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
I think that this is an amazing accomplishment, but Sony should have put it in a laptop because it is only 11". To be a T.V. that is extremely small. Sure this technology is alot more efficient, and alot more clear it should be a laptop screen not stand alone. Although it will be alot more successful when they make at least a 20" version.
yes, OLED is supposed to be much more efficient...
...but this 11" TV consumes 45 Watts. That is in the ball park of many 20" LCD monitors or TVs. I would imagine that 15-17" laptop monitors consume significantly less power than their larger, brighter, higher-res desktop counterparts too.
Put this thing in a laptop, and say goodbye to battery life...and you'll still only have an 11" screen.