Other than Live 2.0, which is irrrelevant to most of us....Somebody please explain why anybody would choose this unit over the Denon 3800 with the top of the line HQV chip?...
Because the Qdeo upscaling is as good as the HQV Reon?? I own the LG Bh200 which has the same Qdeo upscaler and it passed every single one of the benchmarks for the HQV disc that my XA2 did. The only difference being that HQV gave a slightly sharper image while the Qdeo was softer and smoother. But otherwise both are nearly identical.
Most people just assume that HQV is the best and therefore anything else sucks, but you should look it up and read more on it. The Qdeo is impressive in its own right. If HQV is top tier so is the Qdeo.
“It's rare if a month flies by without some random university or DIYer proclaiming that the next major jump in battery technology is just over the horizon.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Other than Live 2.0, which is irrrelevant to most of us....Somebody please explain why anybody would choose this unit over the Denon 3800 with the top of the line HQV chip?...
Because the Qdeo upscaling is as good as the HQV Reon?? I own the LG Bh200 which has the same Qdeo upscaler and it passed every single one of the benchmarks for the HQV disc that my XA2 did. The only difference being that HQV gave a slightly sharper image while the Qdeo was softer and smoother. But otherwise both are nearly identical.
Most people just assume that HQV is the best and therefore anything else sucks, but you should look it up and read more on it. The Qdeo is impressive in its own right. If HQV is top tier so is the Qdeo.