<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for NEC's biggest pro LCD yet: 82-inch LCD8205</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/17/necs-biggest-pro-lcd-yet-82-inch-lcd8205/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for NEC's biggest pro LCD yet: 82-inch LCD8205</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on NEC's biggest pro LCD yet: 82-inch LCD8205]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/17/necs-biggest-pro-lcd-yet-82-inch-lcd8205/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/17/necs-biggest-pro-lcd-yet-82-inch-lcd8205/</guid><description><![CDATA[So this 82" is more expensive than the 103" Plasma from Panasonic?? Is that a joke?<br><br>Let's do some comparison:<br><br>NEC 82" LCD:                82-inch<br>Panasonic 103" plasma: 103-inch<br><br>NEC 82" LCD:                5,000:1 contrast ratio<br>Panasonic 103" plasma: 10,000: 1 contrast ratio<br><br>NEC 82" LCD:                60-pixels-short (1920x1020)<br>Panasonic 103" plasma: FULL HD (1920x1080)<br><br>NEC 82" LCD:                $54,999<br>Panasonic 103" plasma: $48,314]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MaShoKaSh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 17th 2008 10:18AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>