<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[FullHD my A**.  I love how some many drool after "1080p" LCDs when they clearly look blurry. People need to realize that when you watch a blu-ray disc, the only static screens are the FBI warning, and rating screens, so the motion resolution test results give the real-world resolution of the HDTV.  I wish Gary had a test for 720, because it would show that 720p Plasmas display higher resolution than 1080p "FullHD" LCDs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chuckdaly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[an important point though; the LN-46A950 can not show that much motion resolution and still pass the 3:2 pulldown test. the mode activated to pass that test reduces the motion resolution to 330 lines. the pioneers just plain pass and still with 83% of its available resolution being used. they are easily the winners of this test IMO. it will be nice to see if they can keep this up with their lcd models]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beau]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 9:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't give a flying crap what these tests say, for my money I will not buy an LCD over a Plasma.  I would hate to think this test would convince anyone to buy a Samsung LCD over a KURO, that would just be stupid.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Loban]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually the test shows that LCDs suck in resolution.  Only one LCD is an exception and it can't pass the 3:2 pulldown test.  Remove that Samsung, and the list is topped with plasma displays. The test ultimately proves you right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[chuckdaly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[A lot of these number figures are pure sensationalism bull crap in real life. Watching a blu-ray on a 1080p set with a supposed 330 lines of resolution in motion is pretty much guaranteed to look better than a 480p signal, even if the 480p signal is 100% reproduced. At least that's what I believe. <br><br>And his praise of samsung is somewhat unfounded because many other samsung sets can't even do full 1080 according to his numbers in static. The 1080p samsung I bought (LN40A650) supposedly can only reproduce 900 lines IN STATIC!!! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jitty]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[Out of all the Panasonic products he couldn't get a motion blur rating for a 50" 1080P.  Why no blur information on 768P displays?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy Sullivan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those of you commenting DID read the article and report, right?  His test were run on 1080i content (max resolution for broadcast), not 1080p. Unless I'm missing something somewhere?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 1:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[Initially I thought (hoped ?) this was a review of HDTV channels which was going to finally give proof to how incredibly poor cable HDTV is.  <br><br>Maybe they could somehow do a standardized test of that?<br><br>We're sick and tired of the HD ads from various companies claiming to be the best when the majority of their stations are just a pixelated headache. So many times it is like watching amateur webcasts.  <br><br>Btw. We have Time Warner Cable (since they bought Adelphia) ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fd]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[What about rear projection TVs , like DLP , LCOS , HDILA ,   do those have low rez on motion also?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 6:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[Despite using wobulation, DLPs usually have anywhere from 600-850 lines of motion resolution.<br><br>If we ever saw 3 chip DLP TVs using 1920x1080 DMD panels it's likely we'd see full motion resolution.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 7:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's it... I'm waiting for OLED mass-production and -adoption.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sixtyfps]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 29th 2008 11:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD Guru evaluates 125 HDTVs in the resolution loss test]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/09/29/hd-guru-evaluates125-hdtvs-in-the-resolution-loss-test/</guid><description><![CDATA[again... proves Plasma is better than LCD. I hope everybody begins to realize this cause it bugs me so much that so many people are misinformed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SVTruong]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 30th 2008 12:12PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>