A lot of these number figures are pure sensationalism bull crap in real life. Watching a blu-ray on a 1080p set with a supposed 330 lines of resolution in motion is pretty much guaranteed to look better than a 480p signal, even if the 480p signal is 100% reproduced. At least that's what I believe.
And his praise of samsung is somewhat unfounded because many other samsung sets can't even do full 1080 according to his numbers in static. The 1080p samsung I bought (LN40A650) supposedly can only reproduce 900 lines IN STATIC!!!
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
A lot of these number figures are pure sensationalism bull crap in real life. Watching a blu-ray on a 1080p set with a supposed 330 lines of resolution in motion is pretty much guaranteed to look better than a 480p signal, even if the 480p signal is 100% reproduced. At least that's what I believe.
And his praise of samsung is somewhat unfounded because many other samsung sets can't even do full 1080 according to his numbers in static. The 1080p samsung I bought (LN40A650) supposedly can only reproduce 900 lines IN STATIC!!!
Out of all the Panasonic products he couldn't get a motion blur rating for a 50" 1080P. Why no blur information on 768P displays?