THANK YOU. I'm glad someone finally called a spade a spade and said that 120 Hz is a bad thing.
It could have been great for eliminating judder, but instead these companies interpolate frames and make it a big runny, uber-smooth mess. Film isn't made to look silky-smooth.
I literally almost get sick watching 120 Hz displays. I saw Sony's new 240 Hz displays at CEDIA, and they're even worse. It's creating data that wasn't there, and it ruins the experience.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
THANK YOU. I'm glad someone finally called a spade a spade and said that 120 Hz is a bad thing.
It could have been great for eliminating judder, but instead these companies interpolate frames and make it a big runny, uber-smooth mess. Film isn't made to look silky-smooth.
I literally almost get sick watching 120 Hz displays. I saw Sony's new 240 Hz displays at CEDIA, and they're even worse. It's creating data that wasn't there, and it ruins the experience.