<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review </title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[My question is how these might compare to similarly priced HTIB's from Sony and Onkyo... will the cheap 5.1 always win out, or do these actually sound better than cheap HTIB's, even without the extra speakers?<br><br>Inquiring minds want to know...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[palehorse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 2:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good question -- I haven't had one of the Onkyo/Sony HTIB systems in my setup, so this is based on in-store vs. in-home comparison, but I'd say that the overall quality is similar, with perhaps a slight edge for the ZVOX sound quality (tonal balance, compression, etc.).  The nod goes to the discrete HTIB systems for creating a true surround-soundfield.  Overall convenience would go for the soundbar, though. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 3:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[So what's the price on the 550?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The ZVOX 550 goes for $500. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I want to know how these would even match up against Onkyo's HT-S9100THX 7.1 that goes for $799.00? Or how about Yamaha's sound bar offerings, which from what I remember were highly rated by cnet?<br><br>Anyone know?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny Neat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I fail to see the consumer appeal of this product that appears to be many years behind in technology.  This is evident in the lack of digital inputs, Dolby Digital or DTS encoders.  <br>ZVOX must not have performed a market survey prior to the initial concept phase of this product launch.  Doing so would have provided them with a clear view of what features have been implemented and adopted buy consumers with product offerings from Yamaha and even Sony with their HT-CT100 and RHT-S10 that offer HDMI switching, Dolby Digital and DTS Encoders, and even accept up 7.1 PCM decoded audio via Blu-ray players.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Seph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 18th 2008 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi – this is a reply from Tom, at ZVOX. Thanks for your comments.<br>We use an analog, phase-manipulation design (we call it PhaseCue) for virtual surround sound because we prefer it to the digital alternatives. It provides a wide, deep, three-dimensional sound field without sacrificing musical accuracy or vocal clarity. In our experience, creating virtual surround in the digital domain almost always generates some less-than-natural results – for example, rain that sounds like white noise or female vocalists that take on a twangy sound.<br>We also find our customers prefer using the analog output of a TV because in many cases it allows them to use the TV remote to control the volume of the ZVOX. And we find that there is no audible difference between using an analog input vs. a digital input. <br>As for switching, we’ve found that most people would much rather use their TV to do switching, rather than using the sound system. It’s simpler, more intuitive and requires the use of fewer remote controls. And we’d rather spend dollars on quality speaker drivers and wood cabinets than on switching systems most people won’t use.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZVOX Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2008 1:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm really enjoying your write ups Steve.  I know this is an HD site but keep the audio reviews coming!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[micknkeif]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2008 1:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks -- I've got some more stuff lined up, so stay tuned!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 19th 2008 11:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[How does the ZVOX 415 fare in all of this? I understand it's one of the models they're<br>offering a discount on during this Holiday season.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 23rd 2008 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The ZVOX 415 uses the same amplifier and virtual surround system (we call it PhaseCue) as the Z-Base 550 -- but in a 30.5"w x 5.5"h x 5"d soundbar-style design (you can wall-mount it or put it on a shelf beneath your TV). It uses three 3.25" main speaker drivers (versus the five 2" drivers in the 550), and a 4" woofer with a 4" passive radiator (versus the 5.25" woofer in the 550). Because the cabinet is smaller than the 550's (838 cubic inches vs. 1116 cubic inches) the 415's bass has less punch than the 550. In most other ways the sound is pretty comparable.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZVOX Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 2nd 2008 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[In 2007, we purchased our first LCD-HDTV; a 20-inch Sharp AQUOS for use in the kitchen.  Great picture, disappointing sound; so I discovered and bought a ZVOX Mini.  It rocks!  Not only is the sound quality excellent at all volumes, but the best part is that it requires zero effort or skill to use.  I actually had to prepare a cheat sheet for family use of our larger, older system: a DVD player, TV and stereo system that required several steps to play a DVD with surround sound.  The ZVOX turns itself on-off with the TV and we use the TV remote to adjust the sound level.  It is well made and a joy to use.  I had one tech support query (turned out to be a bad battery in the remote that we don't use anyway; but ZVOX replied promptly and offered to replace the remote if there was a problem).  I have become a real fan because ZVOX obviously has put a lot of thought and effort into designing and making a simple, high quality product that sounds great, and they stand behind it.  We are now looking at adding some large 40-52 inch HDTV's and I plan to buy additional ZVOX 425/550 units because of the convenience and excellent experience with the Mini.  So I want to see ZVOX hang around for a long time!  I have looked at HTIB offerings and think most of them look and sound pretty cheap.  The ZVOX line is unobtrusive, so you don't have the visual clutter.  Unless you like the intrusive look of speakers everywhere or are in the movie business or have a REAL home threater setup with a big investment in speakers and audio equipment, you are like most people who want to turn on the TV and watch a movie/sporting event with very good sound.  They have a 30-day trial, so you really can't lose by trying them, and I think you will be pleasantly surprised at what you hear.  I was awed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CD Hill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 24th 2008 11:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[man, the industrial design looks a WHOLE lot like the YSP-800/900 Yamahas.  Is Zvox a cheapo Yamaha brand...kinda like Aiwa was for Sony?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inteller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 4th 2008 10:40AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hi, this is Tom, from ZVOX. We aren't associated with Yamaha in any way. And while our systems are typically less expensive than Yamaha's, we use MDF cabinets, high-quality speaker drivers and amplifiers. What we don't spend money on is a wide variety of digital inputs, switching systems, Dolby decoders, and displays -- because most people have a good TV that will provide all those.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZVOX Tom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great review and equally interesting comments.  Since I'm in the market for a quality, (more or less) affordable product such as this, I am curious about connectivity when you have a TV monitor (ie, no tuner or speakers), a satellite receiver and a dvd player.  Will these ZVOX products allow you to easily connect all 3 components or will it be necessary to eliminate 1 of them?  Also, can the 550 handle the weight of a 50 inch, 130 lb PDP?  Thanks]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Perfecto]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2008 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[The 550 has two inputs, so your DVD and sat receiver can both be hooked up at the same time.  The ZVOX website says the 550 can support up to 90 pounds, so your 50-inch plasma might be a little heavy, though.  I'd contact them directly and see if you can stretch to 130 pounds safely. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2008 1:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I, like a lot of people want the Home Theater experience without adding a lot of hardware and wiring. I started looking into soundbar's and the more I looked, the more confused I got. No HDMI's on this model, no video switching on that model, not enough audio inputs on any model, ETC, ETC. I am interested in the ZVOX 425 because of all of the very good reviews I have read so far. (More so than any other manufacturer). I want to be able to watch movies and experience the surround sound experience. I am not a great movie buff or music connosueir. Will your product deliver the sound I am hoping for in a 12' x 24' room, ( I realize that this is not a true 5.1 surround system). I also want to piggyback off of Perfecto's question. I have a DVD player and a DVR with a 5 connector cable hooked up to my HDTV. Will I be able to hook up my components to your unit.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RonS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2008 1:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[RonS:<br>The room I tested the 425 in is about the same size as yours, maybe a little bigger since it opens into the kitchen -- I think it will fill your room with sound, provided you're not after ear-splitting levels.  It has two inputs, so you will be able to feed it stereo from both your DVR and DVD player.  As for wanting "the surround sound experience," you'll get a good stereo image that sounds like it's floating out in your room.  It's not as "surround-y" as discrete multichannel speakers (that require wire and boxes), but it's better than what you'll get out of your TV alone.  You'll have to decide for yourself if the soundstage presented by the 425 (or any soundbar) fits your needs. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Kim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 16th 2008 12:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am seriously considering the 550 as I believe it is the perfect product for my application.  Here's the situation, I just bought a brand new home back in March and it came with a beautiful double mantle configuration in the living room that was built specifically to hold a 42" flat screen TV.  I had a matching shelf built  to go inside it and house the Direct TV DVR and Blue Ray DVD player, plus I left enough room so that there are 3&1/2" from the top of the TV to the top of the double mantle opening.  I didn't do it for a reason, it just worked out that way. <br><br>I don't have room for a surround sound receiver component and I don't want to spend a lot of money paying someone to run wires behind the sheet-rock, not even sure they can without a lot of work. <br><br>So I am looking for something that will be an upgrade in TV sound to help fill up the room, doesn't have a receiver or separate bass module, and will fit in the 3&1/2" I've got left.  Not really concerned about surround sound...I am building a media room in the basement and will blow it out down there.  Just looking for a sound upgrade that works in my configuration and really delivers quality sound.  <br><br>Based on what I have read, the 550 sounds like just what I am looking for!<br><br>I think ZVOX should market the 550 for the above the mantle or double mantle configurations.  Every house in my subdivision has a double mantle of some sort, either just a recessed spot for a TV or a true double mantle like mine, and all of them could probably use this device to boost the sound quality. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Gerson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 30th 2008 1:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can you control the volume with the remote of a Samsung LN40A550 LCD TV with the Zvox 550?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[William Davis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 10th 2009 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ZVOX 425 and 550 soundbars review ]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/11/18/zvox-425-and-550-soundbars-review/</guid><description><![CDATA[I was looking online for surround systems to compliment the new DLP we purchased for our home. Neither my wife nor I wanted a system with a bunch of wiring to string all over the room and when I saw the ZVOX unit on the website that fit underneath the T.V. we decided to give it a try. I may add a sub woofer just because I like a little more bass than the unit produces but the virtual surround sound is incredible. The cabinet is very nice and adds to the "look" of our T.V. I actually built a couple of black box supports for the ends of my T.V. since the units specs did not recommend placing a T.V. the size we purchased on top of the Z-Base 550 without additional support. I turn the T.V. sound back on occasionally just to revel in the difference.The only thing I haven't figured out yet is how to get my universal remote to work the Z-Vox unit but it is no big issue for sure. Worth the money!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale Allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 12th 2009 5:22PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>