http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/ Engadget HD Comments for ZeroWire 2.0: Wireless 1080p for less than $50 per device http://hd.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://hd.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 10:48AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/
It'd be great to see this sort of thing catch on just because but you'll see more competitors before you see many major CE manufacturers building them into things. And if only one or two build them in, their products are now more expensive. The silly part? I would think the part that plugs into the television takes up a video plug anyway so it's only valuable if you really want that device somewhere other than beside your television. It's great tech though but better as standalone. (Or be sure it's built into TVs first...?)

And for anyone who might want to hit me with "economies of scale" and how this won't be that pricey if enough CE manufacturers use them, just remember that no matter how low the price is, it's still cheaper not to use them and, so far, not having these has worked out just fine.]]>Dec 3rd 2008 11:35AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/
I think I will stick with my $7-15 15-foot HDMI cables from Monoproce.]]>Dec 3rd 2008 1:49PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 11:24AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 11:55AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 11:45AMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 12:07PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/
Because of that, the term Blu-ray DVD is incorrect as you are appending two wholly different trademarks to each other]]>Dec 3rd 2008 12:20PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 12:38PMhttp://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/03/zerowire-2-0-wireless-1080p-for-less-than-50-per-device/Dec 3rd 2008 12:42PM