<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[youtube is not HD vimeo i think has better quality and so does the ning platform,youtube is total crap when it comes to video quality..they may say its hd but its not true hd its just a higher quality]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 7:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[I completely disagree. The YouTube HD (not to be mistaken for high quality mode) IMO easily trumps the quality of Vimeo's HD vids. Go watch "Where the Hell is Matt 2008" at both sites in HD, the YouTube version is clearer.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TLoganK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 8:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just as an FYI, the article quotes Dark Shikari from the Doom9 forum. He is THE man when it comes to x264 (the high-quality, open-source codec used on Youtube and elsewhere). On another note, 256 kbit for AAC audio? Talk about overkill.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Garrett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[Vimeo is superior in every way. <br>YouTube is for people post slideshows of their favorite actors set to their favorite love song. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[G-house]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have no clue what you are talking about, you obviously haven't compared the YouTubeHD to Vimeo HD like myself and Johhny did.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TLoganK]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just did a side by side comparison with both Matt videos..I used Youtube HD verison via the qt link.. The youtubes version CLEARLY is better....They are both identicle resoultions but the main difference I saw was that the youtubes picture was brighter and I could see more details in dark scenes. I froze the scene at around second 6 roughly and it took me about 5 minutes to get them perfect. You can clearly see that the youtubes video is brighter and clearer! His right eye is completely blacked out in the vimeo pic whereas in the youtube vid, you can make out at least his eye socket. Also the overall pic quality is just better!<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Johhny]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 9th 2008 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HD quality comparison of online video sharing sites]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/09/hd-quality-comparison-of-online-video-sharing-sites/</guid><description><![CDATA[Youtube HD ftw.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pedro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2008 12:06AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>