<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[I own an HDTV and use only OTA simply because there's nothing on cable I'm interested in watching, so I see no reason to subscribe to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dreamscape86]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[Cable is too expensive, but it isn't because of the 40 or 50 HD channels, it's because of the 250 SD channels that I don't watch and the 75 music channels that I don't listen to that I also have to buy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J.Goodwin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have 3 HDTV's and subscribe to no cable service whatsoever. I get roughly 25 channels free OTA, have a blu-ray equipped Netflix account, and lots of HD content available online.<br><br>I don't have the TIME, forget the money, to watch any more HD content than that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Nicholson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[How much longer until we can live in a day and age when HD is standard?  Like when color became standard over black & white.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fuzz 53]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 5:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[A co-worker just got a new 1080p set.  He says it has a "beautiful picture".  Of course, he must be watching in "Stretch-o-Vision" because he hasn't had his cable package upgraded to HD yet. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[May be he is watching clear QAM network channels!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[siva]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 6:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[QAM?  This is a guy who called Sony tech support to ask them where the "@" key on his VAIO keyboard was located.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Galley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2008 8:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HDTV / HD programming gap gets slimmer, still significant]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/11/hdtv-hd-programming-gap-gets-slimmer-still-significant/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just today I was talking to a co-worker about her family's new HDTV.  She remarked that news anchors now "have a bit of a weight problem," which tells me that the family is watching the news in stretch-o-vision.  Aside from the fact that three of the four news channels in our DMA are doing HD news, I feel compelled to invite myself over to her house to "fix" their problem of essentially no HD content on their beautiful TV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Sterling]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2008 8:03PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>