How many people reading engadget use only OTA signals on analog-only TVs? 3 maybe? The switchover is irrelevant if you have cable/satelite or an HDTV of. Who here doesn't have either?
It's prefectly reasonable that he wouldn't have cable/sat running into his garage. Especially if he's got satellite, and didn't want to add another STB to a TV that probably doesn't get taht much use.
I have OTA only, and I read EngadgetHD every day. I get my high def broadcasts through a DirecTV box with an ATSC tuner hooked up to my computer monitor. I get 720p broadcasts on a 24" monitor, and all it costs is the $50 I spent on the receiver.
HD content doesn't have to cost sixty bucks a month.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
How many people reading engadget use only OTA signals on analog-only TVs? 3 maybe? The switchover is irrelevant if you have cable/satelite or an HDTV of. Who here doesn't have either?
It's prefectly reasonable that he wouldn't have cable/sat running into his garage. Especially if he's got satellite, and didn't want to add another STB to a TV that probably doesn't get taht much use.
I have OTA only, and I read EngadgetHD every day. I get my high def broadcasts through a DirecTV box with an ATSC tuner hooked up to my computer monitor. I get 720p broadcasts on a 24" monitor, and all it costs is the $50 I spent on the receiver.
HD content doesn't have to cost sixty bucks a month.