"These things [Blu-ray Discs] cost money. We deploy money where we think it's going to be most efficient to keep subscribers and investors happy. It's always check and balances."
That would be an ok answer if they weren't charging people extra for Blu-Ray access. Why should people pay extra (I know it's just $1, but still) for something they can't access?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
"These things [Blu-ray Discs] cost money. We deploy money where we think it's going to be most efficient to keep subscribers and investors happy. It's always check and balances."
That would be an ok answer if they weren't charging people extra for Blu-Ray access. Why should people pay extra (I know it's just $1, but still) for something they can't access?