<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget HD - Comments for Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada</title>
<link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link>
<description>Engadget HD Comments for Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow for that amount of money I could buy a normal sized 40 inch flat panel plus bluray surround sound with money left over ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zioncat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 25th 2008 11:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[But wouldn't you rather have a television that rivals 90s models in thinness?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 12:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[This would be such an advantage, I mean I spend hours on end staring at the back of my TV! Mind you looking at this TV side on, one could only assume the thickness they are mentioning here is only taking into account the top portion of the TV, the one third sized area of the back, oh wow!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[simone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 5:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's very thin but when the base protrudes 6-7 to the back, what does it even matter? I think I'd prefer a thicker TV if it meant paying less, getting better contrast or other features.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrXym]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 7:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[I believe this is side-lit, not back-lit, and it will have the same uneven and off-axis characteristics as laptop screens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[clara]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 29th 2008 11:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sony's 9.9mm thin BRAVIA KLV-40ZX1M heads to Canada]]></title><link>http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://hd.engadget.com/2008/12/25/sonys-9-9mm-thin-bravia-klv-40zx1m-heads-to-canada/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is not 9.9mm thin, it is 9.9mm thick.  Realtor should stop talking about "this house is 3 year new" also.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[batmon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2008 4:07PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>