it's the pricing on movies, which on catalog titles and other ones, at $35-40 is just too darn high. Yes it gives studios more income. but when on a back catalog you take a movie sold for $10 or $15, and price it for $35-40 list price, as Fox does, consumers balk at those higher prices.
these HD Blu-Ray discs should be no more than $5 more than their comparable DVD versions. in this economy people don't want an HD Tax.
“An engineer explained to us that hundreds of ear impressions were gathered in the name of research, and while each one obviously boasted its own unique shape and size, one single characteristic remained uniform across the board: the entrance into the ear canal is not a perfect circle, it's an oval.”
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
it's the pricing on movies, which on catalog titles and other ones, at $35-40 is just too darn high. Yes it gives studios more income. but when on a back catalog you take a movie sold for $10 or $15, and price it for $35-40 list price, as Fox does, consumers balk at those higher prices.
these HD Blu-Ray discs should be no more than $5 more than their comparable DVD versions. in this economy people don't want an HD Tax.