Samsung prepping 6.5mm LCD for CES?



The percentage of electronics at the end of their lives which were recycled.
The EPA found that the percentage remained consistent from 1999-2005. Even as recycling rates went up, the amount of electronics reaching end of life outpaced the increase, leaving the figure static. (source: EPA, July 2008)
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
As long as you can remove the base, I'll acknowledge that it's the world's thinnest TV, provided that you can remove the base. That's right Sony, that a direct jab at you! You can't say a TV is 3mm thick when you can't remove that monstrosity of a base. Even if you could fold the screen flat against the base (which you can't, nor can you even fold it parallel to the base) it would be still be one ugly ass TV to look at!
What's with this obsession to make "the world's thinnest tv?" How about making an 60-70 something inch LCD with 120hz more affordable first.
Agreed. I'm getting really tired of hearing about how "thin" these new TVs are. Who cares?? The difference between a 5cm thick TV and 5mm really doesn't matter. But the press, engadget included, just seems to want to jump on the bandwagon and reinforce all this talk about thinness. Let's talk about things that matter, like performance, features and price.