http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/ Engadget Comments for WirelessHD hands on & recklessly-interfering http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/Non-integrated for a $700 premium and they've got themselves a wiener!]]>Jan 8th 2009 9:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/
I mean, how hard is it to run a cable all of 3 feet?]]>Jan 8th 2009 9:35PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/Jan 8th 2009 10:31PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/Jan 9th 2009 10:35AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/Jan 8th 2009 9:42PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/
What is the delay introduced by the wireless encoder/decoder?

In other words, if you're using this just for a wireless display (e.g. screen on wall, or projector), but use a hardwired digital connection for your audio - will the image & audio be out of sync?!

Luis.]]>Jan 9th 2009 8:24AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/
I think I will always prefer a 100% original signal going into my HDTV. Not one which is encoded / decoded again.

I do see the benefits of having your A/v equipment tucked away though, as long as the remote still work... IR blaster time.]]>Jan 9th 2009 3:38PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/Jan 19th 2009 10:47AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/08/wireless-hd-hands-on-and-recklessly-interfering/THIS was the sum total of your CES2009 effort?
http://www.trustedreviews.com/images/article/inline/9804-wirelesshd.jpg
Sibeam may win the standards battle, but you shouldn't.]]>Jan 22nd 2009 1:48PM